Landmark Court Ruling Has Pension Holders Furious – Here’s Why Others May Soon Feel the Same
From Birch Gold Group
State and local governments around the country are struggling to reconcile the debt they owe to public pension programs. Several Californian localities, in particular, have been overwhelmed with insurmountable levels of pension debt obligation.
“State and local pensions across the U.S. have $1.8 trillion less than needed to cover all the benefits owed in the decades ahead, according to Federal Reserve Board data. The need to make up for such shortfalls has contributed to credit-rating cuts to Illinois, New Jersey and Chicago. Such financial pressure has also been acute in California, where it helped bankrupt the cities of Stockton, San Bernardino and Vallejo.”
Until last month, state law in California dictated that these governments do whatever necessary to keep pension plans intact, but now a new court decision is giving them free reign to gut the plans as they see fit.
“Along with death and taxes, Californians have counted on another inevitability: once pension promises are made to public employees, they can’t be rolled back.”
“That belief, which has guided officials as they deal with mounting bills to cash-strapped retirement plans, was shaken in August when a state appellate court said benefit cuts are permissible if the pensions remain ‘reasonable’ for workers.”
That’s not going to help them get rid of the problem anytime soon, though. With Baby Boomers set to retire in record numbers over the next several years, Negative Interest Rate Policy (NIRP) potentially on the table, and the possibility of trouble in the bond market (where most pensions are heavily invested), things could get a lot worse for pension holders – not just in California, but across the U.S.
A dangerous new precedent
Until this decision, California governments were explicitly required to maintain benefit levels of their public pension plans. If they took something away, it had to be replaced in-kind by some other benefit or form of compensation.
Now that rule is gone, and some believe it could cause governments around the U.S. to re-evaluate their obligations to pension holders too.
“Going from an absolute ‘no’ to a ‘yes, if it’s reasonable’ is a huge shift in the political debate as well as the legal debate,” former San Jose mayor Chuck Reed said to Bloomberg. “In order to save their jurisdictions from insolvency, some systems will be motivated to try to make some changes.”
Negative rates could make a bad situation worse
As if pension plans didn’t have enough working against them, there’s one big factor that could compound their plight even further: negative interest rates.
The problem stems from the fact that pension plans rely on steady returns from their investments in stocks and bonds to stay viable and solvent. Without those returns, pensions have no way to reliably pay out benefits obliged to plan holders.
And when the Fed pushes rates down, it becomes exceedingly difficult for pension managers to get those crucial investment returns.
According to John Mauldin, low interest rates on their own, such as the ones we’ve seen for the past several years, are enough to severely risk putting pensions in the red. However, if we enter the world of negative rates, which doesn’t seem terribly unlikely, it could set us up for a major collapse in the entire pension system.
Add to that the issue of how negative interest rates could tank the bond market, in which most pension plans are heavily invested, and you’ve got a perfect storm brewing.
Why gold could be pension holders’ best friend
As you’ve seen here, the prospect of relying entirely on a pension plan for your retirement isn’t ideal. Pensions can be cut; their holdings can be decimated by the whims of the market; and now the government can effectively legislate your hard-fought pension dollars away from you!
Unlike pensions, physical gold isn’t subject to any of those risks. The only person who holds power of the money you invest in gold is you.
Looking at how uncertain the situation is now, protecting your retirement with gold could make a lot of sense – regardless of the status of your own retirement savings, but especially if you’re invested in a pension plan.Featured